Recent Broward Law Blog Features

Showing posts with label medical Dispensaries. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical Dispensaries. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Federal Sentencing of Medical Dispensary Owner Postponed by Judge


Great news from Los Angeles...

A federal judge here Monday postponed the sentencing of a man convicted of running a medical marijuana dispensary and asked the Department of Justice to clarify its revised position on such cases.

Attorney General
Eric H. Holder Jr.said last week that federal authorities would not seek to prosecute medical marijuana dispensaries if the operations complied with state and local laws, a departure from the Bush administration policy that federal narcotics laws held sway. California is one of 13 states that allow the growth and sales of medical marijuana with a doctor’s recommendation.

“The judge said this statement raises more questions than it answers,” said Reuven Cohen, a lawyer for the defendant, Charles Lynch. “He said he needed an explanation, and he needed it from the Department of Justice, not the local prosecutor.”

Thom Mrozek, a spokesman for the United States attorney in Los Angeles, said that he could not comment on the specifics of the request by Judge George H. Wu, but that prosecutors “do believe that Mr. Lynch violated state law.”

Last August, a jury convicted Mr. Lynch on five counts related to running a dispensary and selling medical marijuana to customers under 21, considered minors under a federal statute that prohibits the sale of marijuana and other narcotics to minors. Mr. Lynch faces a minimum sentence of five years in federal prison.

The case has been widely followed by medical marijuana advocates since Mr. Lynch was arrested after a 2007 raid on his dispensary in Morro Bay, Calif.

“He’s scared,” Mr. Cohen said of Mr. Lynch. “He’s an engineer with no criminal record. In a million years, he never thought that this is where he’d be.”

Prosecutors convicted Mr. Lynch under federal statutes last summer. The issue of state law was barred from being raised in the trial, Mr. Cohen said. Here is my post about the situation a few weeks ago on The Kent Vent....



Thursday, February 26, 2009

AG Eric Holder Affirms He Will End Raids on Medical Cannabis Providers


Score one for the good guys!


My friend Paul Armentano is reporting some great news on the NORML blog today. At least for me and people who have been working for years to fight for a change in American cannabis laws.

Earlier this month, new U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder promised a clean break from the policies of the Bush administration. Yesterday, during a live interview on C-Span, he affirmed that this change includes ending the DEA raids of state-authorized medical marijuana providers.

Responding to a reporter’s question regarding the DEA’s recent actions against several California medical cannabis providers, Holder stated: “What the President said during the campaign . . . will be consistent with what we will be doing here in law enforcement. . . What [President Obama] said during the campaign . . . is now American policy.”You can watch the video of Attorney General Holder’s remarks here.

Holder’s statement marks a dramatic shift in U.S. drug policy, and is a major victory for the 72 million Americans who reside in states where the use of medical cannabis is legal! It also lends support to the ongoing efforts in Minnesota, New Jersey, and Rhode Island — each of which are debating legislative proposals to make the production and distribution of medical cannabis legal under state law.

“Change we can believe in?” Yes it is, says Armentano, "and it’s about time." I concur.

Your friendly neighborhood blogger's post on this subject just yesterday is right here. There is time to save Charles Lynch.

Will be in DC next week for the NORML Board of Directors meeting (http://www.norml.org/); definitely going to follow Forrest Gump's advice and bring Eric Holder a box of chocolates. Not brownies, just chocolates. :-)

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Law.Com Runs Fine Piece on Fine Line for Pot Lawyers Representing California Growers


Just a short blog about a long article, notably copyrighted at law.com, relating to the ethical dilemmas lawyers face in California when advising clients about medical dispensaries.

As a dual resident of California and Florida, I have seen up close and personal the drastically disparate ways each state deals with marijuana issues. In Florida, its 'okay, out of the car, hands on the door.' In Cali, its 'do you have a 'scrip for that baggie?' That's a whole 'nother blawg for a different day. **

The law.com piece carefully scriptures the dichotomy lawyers face when advising clients who grow pot or run dispensaries. You see, the dilemma is this. California citizens passed prop 215 and legalized marijuana for medical uses. Many people like me have scrips. But the Feds have said we do not care what the states do: it's illegal and in case you have not noticed it we are raiding the dispensaries.

Now if you are a lawyer, what kind of advice do you give the client? I mean, if you show him how to comply with state law, you are in effect advising him to break federal law. Not a comfortable position to be in, and this piece details the trials and tribulations of attorneys in reconciling the consequences thereof. The article talks about this murky area that lawyers have to find a comfort zone in, thus the title, 'Pot Lawyers Walk a Fine Line'. Meanwhile, your clients are also facing jail from federal indictments. This article tracks one such victim, and I think that is the right word. He is not a criminal. He is a drug war victim.

I see that the Media Awareness Project has now posted the article on their site, and that is my link below, but full credit goes to Dan Levine from The Recorder. You google it and it is all over the 'Net, drawing worldwide attention.
http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v09/n172/a03.html

http://www.law.com/jsp/law/sfb/lawArticleSFB.jsp?id=1202428244980&rss=SFB
**(Even that is not a guarantee as every county enforces the regs differently and today someone sued the DMV for targeting medical marijuana smokers in California. Here is the LA Times link: